I believe our team did well on these two debates, especially the second debate. In our first debate, everyone in our team did enough researches especially our team captain. The timing part and personal story is what we need to work on after the first debate. No one in our team tells about the personal story which is our failure. The other team did well on the timing part but their researches are not as strong as ours. They didn't tell the personal story also which is the same mistake as ours. Our group did really well on the second debate. Lauren started the debate with a very powerful story and powerful sources. For me, I believe I did well on the rebuttal part and my timing part. My resources are from BBC which directly shows it is not bias and I also told a personal story to support my debate. Concession also helps me a lot during my rebuttal so i believe i did well  on my part. I think i need to work on my pronunciation next time and present my opinion more clearly. The other team also did pretty well but they just mess up the timing part. They all finished what they prepared to say before the time ended. I think they can improve by doing more researches so they have enough things to say before the time finished. I believe we won the debates because we did more researches and we present better during the debate. Our team captain did really well in the beginning and conclusion parts. Me and Joseph all did well on the rebuttal part so I believe we won the debate. Also The other team kind of fail badly on the timing part and i think our team made less mistakes than the other team also. Consider all these facts, I believe that our group won the debate.